Skip to Content
Categories:

Best Campus Security Looks Past Mental Health

Dear Editor,

Regarding the Feb. 24 opinion piece titled, “Student Should
Say Farewell, Not Hello, to Arms,” I certainly applaud the article’s focus on
improving mental health services for students. It is correct that for some the
transition to a college environment is emotionally and mentally stressful. But
proposing improved mental health services as a be-all, end-all solution to the
problem of campus violence isn’t the way to go.

Improved campus security requires a holistic approach that
addresses both the root causes and the actual actions of campus shooters.
Mental health services are an important part of students’ well-being, but the
fact remains that in the case of all too many shooters — Seung-Hui Cho at
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
, Eric Harris and Dylan
Klebold from Columbine High
School
, among others — thought that it was the
rest of the world that had a problem. Improving the counseling services
available to them wouldn’t have helped anyone.

I’m not sure I understand why the article has such a strong
stance against lawful firearms on campus. Why are Utah
and Colorado schools “scary”? None of the things the
article warns about — the gun misuse and abuse, theft, violence or suicides —
have occurred at any of those schools.

Mental health services, campus alert systems, more security
guards — none of these things will help a student trapped in a room with an
active shooter. But firearms in the hands of licensed, trained individuals
could make a difference.

— CDT Samuel Keane-Rudolph

ARMY ROTC

UWLAX Eagle Bn.

WSU Company

Donate to The UCSD Guardian
$2515
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists at University of California, San Diego. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment, keep printing our papers, and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
Donate to The UCSD Guardian
$2515
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal