UC Accuses Labor Union of Unfair Practice

    The University of California
    filed an unfair labor practice charge with the Public Employment Relations
    Board against the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
    last week, citing concerns regarding patient safety at UC medical centers and
    claiming that the union is not bargaining in good faith.

    The charge is a response to a temporary restraining order
    that AFSCME filed against the university earlier this month, after campus
    security threatened to arrest individuals distributing union leaflets at the UC
    San Francisco Medical Center.

    Nicole Savickas, coordinator of Human Resources and Labor
    for the UC Office of the President, said the union violated Article One of its
    access agreement with the university, which states, “AFSCME will abide by the
    reasonable access rules and regulations promulgated at each campus/laboratory.”

    She said that the university has received complaints from
    patients at UCSF and UCLA medical centers who claim they have been harassed.

    “Access policies are laid out with respect to patients and
    their families to provide them unfettered access to the medical centers,”
    Savickas said. “In order to provide the standard of care we are known for, we
    have to uphold these policies.”

    In addition, she said the union’s decision to go directly to
    court to prevent university intervention in its activities demonstrated bad
    faith bargaining, and that it should have taken its complaints to PERB, which
    is responsible for regulating access issues and bargaining conduct.

    Anne Swinburn, a researcher for AFSCME Local 3299, said that
    Article One simply refers to meetings with union members, not communication
    with the public. She said the university’s charge is simply an attempt to limit
    free speech, and that PERB has nothing to do with this issue.

    “They’re basically saying that we signed our free speech
    rights away when we signed up with a union,” Swinburn said. “Our free speech
    with the public is governed by the California Constitution, not PERB.”

    AFSCME Local 3299 President Lakesha Harrison said she agrees
    that the university’s attempt to link the issue to PERB is baseless. She said
    that she and other union representatives had been distributing materials at all
    five UC medical centers for three weeks before any complaints arose, and that
    the distribution operations have all been “peaceful and pleasant,” never
    consisting of more than two or three people.

    “We’re not being confrontational,” Harrison
    said. “We’re not picketing. People just take [the leaflet] and keep walking.”

    Meanwhile, UC-AFSCME negotiations regarding the university’s
    11,000 patient care technical employees have lasted over five months, and, in a
    statement last week, the university related AFSCME’s leafleting to the union’s
    recent concerns about the quality of employee and patient care at UC medical

    The statement included a list of rankings and specific honors
    that the university’s medical centers have received in the past year.

    Staff turnover rates, high stress environments and low
    worker morale have all been items of contention in recent months, and union
    members — including Swinburn — believe that poor employee conditions lead to
    poor patient conditions.

    However, Swinburn said that although these issues are
    controversial, it is inappropriate for the university to even mention the
    content of the leaflets when making a case against their distribution.

    “This is a clear-cut free speech case,” she said. “The
    university doesn’t want us to communicate with patients about these issues, and
    that’s why they are trying to limit our free speech. This is a violation of our
    fundamental rights.”

    Harrison said that over the past few
    years, AFSCME has conducted extensive research comparing state wages and
    benefits and their effects on the overall level of hospital care, and union
    members believe they have a responsibility to publicize this information.

    “We are not saying anything that we have not researched to
    the bone,” she said. “As workers, we’ve always known it is a problem. Now we
    finally have the research to back up what we’re concerned about, and the public
    has a right to know.”

    More to Discover
    Donate to The UCSD Guardian
    Our Goal

    Your donation will support the student journalists at University of California, San Diego. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment, keep printing our papers, and cover our annual website hosting costs.

    Donate to The UCSD Guardian
    Our Goal