toll road agency announced last week that it was asking the U.S. Department of
Commerce to reconsider a Feb. 6 decision by the California Coastal Commission
that decisively halted construction plans for a toll road through San Onofre
State Park.
Heading north, the proposed toll road would begin south of
Clemente
and run 16 miles to cut across the San Diego/Orange County line.
The commission made its final 8-2 decision at the end of a
12-hour meeting attended by nearly 3,500
at the
Diegans have paid particular attention to the roadway because San Onofre is a
common vacation destination and the nation’s fifth most visited state park.
Many panelists sided with Chairman Pat Kruer of Rancho Santa
Fe in finding the toll road inconsistent with
state laws regulating development along the coastline.
UCSD’s A.S. Council passed a resolution last year voicing
opposition to the project, which was submitted by then-Eleanor Roosevelt
College Junior Senator Kerry Kassam.
“I think it’s important to preserve what’s left of our
natural beauty in
Kassam said. “San Onofre, especially
places that students can visit to camp, swim, surf and indulge in a little bit
of calm.”
attended the meeting in
and said she agreed with Kassam’s concerns.
“I think that
already an urban jungle,” Crouch said. “There are so many people with a special
connection to [the park]. It would be morally wrong to destroy it so that
people can drive faster.”
The state park holds several endangered species and an
untainted stretch of San Mateo Creek. In addition, it houses the San Mateo
Campground and several archaeological sites, including the Juaneño American
Indian
Opponents of the $875-million, six-lane project say it would
destroy natural habitats, wetlands and public recreation areas, including the
renowned surfing spot at Trestles. Surfers claim the road would block the
sediment deposits that create the waves there.
Encinitas resident Troy Brajkovich said the ruling was a
huge win for surfers.
“Basically the best spot for professional surfing in
was going to be ruined to a certain extent,” Brajkovich said.
It was estimated that 320 of the park’s 2,100 acres would
have been taken by the project, according to the
Commission.
Transportation Corridor Agencies, the company that operates
that the toll road is necessary to maintain the economy, environment and
quality of life in
60-percent increase in traffic at the Orange/San Diego County border by 2025.
“We are very disappointed that the Coastal Commission failed
to recognize the years of study that have gone into this roadway’s planning and
design to protect the environment and valuable state park and coastal
resources,” Lance MacLean, chairman of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation
Agency, said in a statement.
TCA also cited independent scientific studies as evidence
that the roadway will have “negligible impact” on San Onofre State Park and
More than 40 elected officials from
California
support the roadway.
They said the project is environmentally friendly because it
would reduce pollution from cars sitting in traffic. They also claimed that a
counterproposal by environmentalists to expand Interstate 5 would result in the
elimination of hundreds of homes and businesses next to the freeway while
unsuccessfully confronting problematic traffic delays.
About a dozen elected officials from
Diego
attended the
Those from
supported the construction, while those from coastal cities farther south
protested it.
Crouch said the atmosphere of the public forum at the
Mar meeting was encouraging.
“Generally everyone was being respectful,” she said. “People
were saying that they want to save Trestles for their grandkids.”
Several hundred union workers wearing bright orange shirts
showed up to support the project, shouting “We need the work.”
The road’s opponents, wearing blue T-shirts that read, “Save
the Park, Stop the
booed the proponents.
Hundreds of people wishing to speak submitted requests to be
heard at the meeting.
However, Kruer closed public comment at 8:30 p.m., saying
that if everyone were allowed to speak, the meeting could have lasted up to 38
hours.
Construction on the project cannot commence without the
approval of a coastal development permit, but the secretary of the Department
of Commerce has the right to override the Coastal Commission, a decision not
expected for approximately a year.