Indian Tribe, UCSD Debate Fate of Ancient Remains

    A UCSD committee will soon decide if ancient remains found
    on campus property show evidence of cultural affiliation to the local Kumeyaay
    American Indian tribe, the first step to ending a decades-long dispute over the
    remains’ ownership and final resting place.

    Related Links
    University House Deadline Extended
    University Drops Plans for U-House Rebuilding
    Red Tape Delays Demise of Historic House
    University House Gets Stay of Demolition

    The two skeletons in question were discovered during an
    archeological dig at University House, the historic UCSD chancellor’s
    residence, in 1976. Since that time, the remains have been held at the Museum
    of Man
    , the Smithsonian Institution
    and the San Diego Archaeological
    Center
    .

    Gail Kennedy, a UCLA anthropology professor, was part of the
    archeology class that first unearthed the remains over 30 years ago. The
    archeologists uncovered an older woman and a younger man buried in a very
    interesting ritual, in which the man had part of his fingers cut off and put in
    his mouth, Kennedy said. The skeletons were dated to about 8,350 before
    present, making them around 10,000 years old.

    A long dispute has ensued between archeologists and Kumeyaay
    tribe members, who want the remains returned to them so they can be properly
    reburied.

    “We have a very strict religion on handling and burying
    remains,” said Steve Banegas, spokesman for the Kumeyaay Cultural Repatriation
    Committee, founded in 1997. “We treat them as if they are loved ones or family
    members and rebury them. It’s a very intensive and long process.”

    The federal Native American Graves Protection and
    Repatriation Act of 1990 requires that institutions receiving federal funding
    return American Indian cultural items and human remains to their respective
    tribes. Under this act, local Kumeyaay Indians must prove to the UCSD NAGPRA
    Working Group that the remains indeed belong to their tribe.

    UCSD anthropology professor
    and committee Chair Margaret J. Schoeninger said members will make their
    decision based on evidence in the following categories: geography, kinship,
    biology, archaeology, linguistics, folklore, oral tradition and history.

    Schoeninger said the objective of the UCSD NAGPRA Working
    Group is to review all the evidence before preparing a recommendation to Vice
    Chancellor of Research Arthur B. Ellis.

    However, Banegas said the Kumeyaay are offended that they
    are even being asked to prove information they feel is well-known. The Kumeyaay
    presented cultural songs, stories, maps and history at a Jan. 24 meeting to
    show their ancient ties to the La Jolla area.

    KCRC and the NAGPRA Working Group have met three times
    during this academic year. At the latest meeting on Jan. 24, held at the Barona
    Community Center
    , the committee
    reported on the status of its deliberations and the KCRC presented information
    about the tribe’s history.

    “We are hopeful that ongoing discussions with interested
    parties and state agencies will result in a project that is sensitive to both
    university needs and concerns expressed by members of the community,” UCSD
    spokeswoman Dolores Davies said.

    Banegas, however, said he was dissatisfied with the
    meetings.

    “I had this belief that at an institution of higher learning
    they would have been more open and there would have been a more diverse group
    of people who would meet to learn and understand,” he said. “There’s so much
    here that the committee refuses to hear or that they don’t want to hear. The
    decent thing to do is to treat these remains as respected human beings. We’re
    trying to right the wrong that’s been done for the last 20 to 30 years. We look
    forward to the day of meeting with sincere people as equals.”

    The Kumeyaay have also expressed concern about the proposed
    demolition of University House, which since 2004 has been deemed unlivable. The
    residence was nominated for a position on the National Register of Historic
    Places in November.

    Resting atop an ancient
    American Indian burial ground and built in the unique “pueblo revival”
    style, the property is viewed by historians as archeologically and historically
    important.

    “Our goal is to have a University House that both meets our
    chancellor’s residential needs and our programmatic needs and supports our relationships
    with the community,” Davies said.

    The plans for the repatriation will continue to move forward
    regardless of the University House project, she added.

    Schoeninger said the committee hopes to make a
    recommendation to Ellis by the beginning of Spring Quarter. The recommendation
    will then be transferred to the University
    of California
    ’s NAGPRA Advisory
    Committee, which will approve or reject it.

    “The final decision is made by Provost [Wyatt R.] Hume in
    the UC Office of the President,” Schoeninger said. “We are hopeful that will be
    made during the summer at the very latest.”

    Donate to The UCSD Guardian
    $2505
    $2500
    Contributed
    Our Goal

    Your donation will support the student journalists at University of California, San Diego. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment, keep printing our papers, and cover our annual website hosting costs.

    More to Discover
    Donate to The UCSD Guardian
    $2505
    $2500
    Contributed
    Our Goal